The short answer: The best CPQ for hybrid usage and recurring pricing quotes the subscription, the usage rates, the minimum commit and the prepaid credits on one quote, then bills all of it without anyone re-typing the deal. MonetizeNow does this for B2B SaaS teams on Salesforce, HubSpot or Attio. Salesforce Revenue Cloud, DealHub, Zuora and Nue are the main alternatives.
Key takeaways
- The best CPQ for hybrid pricing is judged by what happens after the signature, not by how pretty the quote looks.
- A hybrid deal has six terms that must reach billing intact: the subscription, the usage rate card, the minimum commit, prepaid credits, the overage rate and any ramps.
- CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) tools that hand usage terms to a separate billing system turn every hybrid deal into a re-keying job for finance.
- Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Nue and Conga fit teams that live in Salesforce; MonetizeNow, DealHub and Chargebee also work with HubSpot.
- Before you buy, make every vendor demo a minimum commit with overage and a mid-term credit top-up on your own pricing.
Hybrid pricing used to be the exception. Now it's the default for any SaaS company with an API, a data product or an AI feature.
The pricing got smarter. Most quote-to-bill stacks didn't. Sales picked a CPQ. Finance picked a billing tool. Nothing connects the commit on the quote to the invoice at the end of the month.
I spent about three years as an accountant and a decade in the NetSuite world before moving into sales leadership, and I've watched this movie a lot. This post covers what a hybrid deal actually needs from a CPQ, then compares the seven tools worth a look in 2026.
What is hybrid pricing in SaaS?
Hybrid pricing in SaaS is a pricing model that combines a recurring subscription fee with charges based on how much the customer actually uses. A customer might pay a flat annual fee for access, then pay per API call, per transaction or per credit consumed on top of it.
Hybrid pricing gives the seller predictable recurring revenue and still lets revenue grow with customer usage. It gives the buyer a known base cost and a way to pay for more only when they need more. That balance is why so many B2B SaaS companies have moved to it, and why so many CPQ tools struggle with it. A seat-based CPQ was built to multiply a price by a quantity once. Hybrid pricing asks the system to keep track of the deal every month for the life of the contract.
What does a hybrid deal look like on a quote?
A hybrid deal on a quote carries six commercial terms, and every one of them has to reach the billing system exactly as the rep sold it. These are the terms most "best CPQ" lists skip, and they are where hybrid deals go wrong.
- Base subscription: the recurring fee for access, seats or a package, usually billed monthly, quarterly or annually in advance.
- Usage rate card: the price per unit of usage. Rate cards are often tiered (each tier priced separately) or volume-based (the whole quantity priced at the tier the total lands in).
- Minimum commit: a dollar amount the customer agrees to spend on usage in a period. The customer pays the greater of actual usage or the commit, never both.
- Prepaid credits: money the customer pays up front that usage draws down over time. Credits need a balance, a start date and an expiry date.
- Overage: the rate charged once usage passes the included amount or the commit, usually billed in arrears (after the month ends).
- Ramps: planned step-ups in price or quantity during the contract, such as a smaller year one and a bigger year two.
Here's the rule I give every CFO: if the billing system can't read a term straight from the quote, someone types it in. If someone types it in, it will be wrong eventually. The question is just which month.
Why do most CPQ tools break on hybrid pricing?
Most CPQ tools break on hybrid pricing because they stop at the signature. The quote gets signed, a PDF lands in the CRM, and somebody in finance rebuilds the commit, the credits and the overage rate in a separate billing system. That handoff is where hybrid deals leak money.
Think of it as a game of telephone. Sales says "$50,000 annual commit, drawn down monthly, overage at list." Finance hears "$50,000 annual subscription." The invoice says something nobody agreed to, and the customer finds it before you do.
A better model is the restaurant ticket. The kitchen cooks from the same ticket the customer ordered from. Nobody re-writes the order on the way to the stove. A CPQ built for hybrid pricing works the same way: Billing runs from the exact contract the rep quoted.
One RevOps (Revenue Operations) team I worked with this year priced on a matrix: usage tiers on one axis, contract term on the other. Their CRM's quoting tool couldn't hold the matrix, so they created a SKU (stock keeping unit) for every combination and re-typed every closed deal into their billing system by hand. The fix wasn't a better spreadsheet. The fix was one catalog and one contract that both Quoting and Billing read from.
If you want the longer argument for why metering, Quoting and Billing belong together, Sandeep covered it in the problem with standalone metering tools.
What is the best CPQ for hybrid pricing in 2026?
The best CPQ for hybrid pricing in 2026 depends on your CRM and on whether you want Billing from the same vendor. Here are the seven tools worth a look for B2B SaaS teams selling subscription plus usage. Each one is described the same way: who it's best for, how it quotes hybrid deals, how it bills usage, and which CRMs it works with.
1. MonetizeNow
- Best for: B2B SaaS teams selling subscription plus usage who want Quoting, Billing and Revenue Recognition on one contract, whatever CRM they run.
- Hybrid quoting: Subscriptions, one-time fees and usage products sit on the same quote. Usage rates can be tiered, volume, flat, block or custom, with the rep setting the per-unit price on the deal. Minimum commits go on the quote as a dollar amount, billed in advance and drawn down, or in arrears for any shortfall. Prepaid credits are a line on the quote, and ramps are built into the quote as planned schedule changes.
- Usage billing: Native. Usage arrives by API, CSV or manual entry, is rated monthly and billed in arrears from the same contract the rep quoted. Prepaid credits are drawn down automatically by usage and commit charges on each invoice, and a mid-term top-up is a simple amendment. The billing schedule is generated on the quote itself, so nobody writes a dated invoice schedule into the terms.
- CRM fit: CRM-agnostic, with first-class integrations to Salesforce, HubSpot and Attio. Your CRM and your ERP (accounting system) stay in place.
MonetizeNow, a Quote-to-Cash solution for B2B SaaS covering CPQ, Billing and Revenue Recognition, was built around one idea: the quote is the ticket. Every customer also gets a dedicated customer success team, usually with a shared Slack channel. See how MonetizeNow Billing picks up a hybrid deal the moment it's signed.
2. Salesforce Revenue Cloud (Agentforce Revenue Management)
- Best for: Companies fully committed to Salesforce with in-house or partner admin capacity.
- Hybrid quoting: Supports token, monetary and quantity commitments, consumption tiers through rate management, and overage billed above a monetary commit.
- Usage billing: Consumption and invoicing are included in the Advanced edition. Invoice Management is sold as an add-on.
- CRM fit: Salesforce only.
- Watch out for: The consumption features sit in the higher Advanced edition, listed at $200 per user per month billed annually. Teams on the original Salesforce CPQ should know it is end of sale, not end of life, and Salesforce is steering customers toward Revenue Cloud.
3. DealHub
- Best for: Teams that want guided-selling CPQ and Billing from one vendor on Salesforce, HubSpot or Microsoft Dynamics.
- Hybrid quoting: DealHub says it automates metered pricing, volume discounts and tiered billing, and that prepaid drawdown models are handled natively.
- Usage billing: DealHub Billing, built through the acquisitions of Subzee (2023) and Subskribe (2025).
- CRM fit: Salesforce, HubSpot and Microsoft Dynamics.
- Watch out for: The billing side came from two acquisitions in about two and a half years. DealHub's billing page doesn't describe minimum commits with overage, so ask to see one built on your pricing.
4. Zuora CPQ
- Best for: Teams already running Zuora Billing inside a Salesforce org.
- Hybrid quoting: Supports usage-based pricing and mid-term amendments. Zuora's Quote Studio supports unit-based prepaid with drawdown, including rollover and validity periods.
- Usage billing: Native in Zuora Billing. Zuora also acquired the Togai metering and rating engine in 2024.
- CRM fit: Quote Studio runs inside Salesforce. HubSpot connects through Zuora's Integration Hub.
- Watch out for: According to Zuora's documentation, enhanced prepaid with drawdown must be turned on by Zuora Support, needs Quotes package version 10.62 or later, and is unit-based only.
5. Nue
- Best for: Salesforce-native teams that want CPQ and Billing inside Salesforce and will run Revenue Recognition elsewhere.
- Hybrid quoting: Rates usage against credits, commits, tiers and overages. Nue launched Credit and Commit Burndown in March 2026.
- Usage billing: Native billing and collections.
- CRM fit: Salesforce-native. Nue's site doesn't list a HubSpot integration.
- Watch out for: No built-in Revenue Recognition. Nue's own site tells customers to connect their ERP, tax and revenue recognition systems.
6. Chargebee CPQ
- Best for: Billing-led teams already on Chargebee that need quotes for sales-assisted deals.
- Hybrid quoting: Supports usage meters, prepaid credits, commit tiers, base plus overage, and ramps.
- Usage billing: Native in Chargebee Billing, included in its Flow plan and above.
- CRM fit: Salesforce and HubSpot.
- Watch out for: CPQ is a paid add-on with no published price. Chargebee's documentation also says its newer HubSpot integration supports only flat-fee and per-unit pricing models, so check how a hybrid quote flows if you run HubSpot.
7. Conga
- Best for: Large Salesforce organizations with complex catalogs that also want contract management from the same vendor.
- Hybrid quoting: Conga CPQ quotes usage products, and Conga Billing rates tiered usage.
- Usage billing: Through Conga Billing, a separate module. Usage is totaled monthly and rated using a pricing matrix.
- CRM fit: Salesforce, plus a separate version that runs outside Salesforce.
- Watch out for: Conga's documentation says a flat or rated usage amount "can be set by a matrix, and it cannot be set by tier." The billing docs don't describe minimum commits or prepaid credits, so confirm both in a demo.
How do you choose a CPQ for usage and recurring pricing?
Choose a CPQ for usage and recurring pricing by testing it on your hardest real deal, not the vendor's demo deal. Bring a quote with a minimum commit, prepaid credits and an overage rate, then ask each vendor to show it from quote to invoice. These are the questions that separate the tools:
- One quote, no SKU sprawl: Can a rep put the subscription, usage, commit and credits on one quote without creating a new SKU for every combination?
- Quote to bill without re-keying: Does Billing read the signed quote directly, or does someone rebuild the deal in another system?
- Mid-term changes: Can you add credits, change a commit or add a usage product with an amendment, and does the system handle the proration?
- Ramps and renewals: Can year two be priced differently from year one, and does the renewal start from the current contract instead of a blank quote?
- CRM fit, now and later: Does it work with the CRM you have today, and the one you might move to in three years?
- Revenue Recognition: Does revenue recognition run from the same contract, or is it another integration to maintain?
For a broader checklist that goes beyond hybrid pricing, see 7 things to look for in CPQ for SaaS. If you're comparing billing tools on their own, our guide to Maxio alternatives for SaaS billing covers that side, and Sandeep's CPQ and Quote-to-Cash roundup covers the wider market.
Frequently asked questions
Can CPQ handle usage-based pricing on its own?
A CPQ can quote usage-based pricing, but it can't bill it on its own. Usage has to be collected, rated against the rate card and invoiced every month for the life of the contract. A CPQ for usage-based pricing either includes native billing or hands the usage terms to a separate billing system, and that handoff is where most errors start.
What is a minimum commit with drawdown?
A minimum commit with drawdown is a contract term where the customer pays a committed dollar amount up front, then usage charges draw that amount down during the period. If usage stays below the commit, the customer still pays the commit. If usage goes above it, the extra is billed as overage. The customer pays the greater of actual usage or the commit.
How do prepaid credits work in a SaaS contract?
Prepaid credits in a SaaS contract are an amount the customer pays in advance and spends as they use the product. Each invoice draws down the credit balance until it reaches zero, and usage after that is billed normally. Credits usually expire at the end of the contract, so the expiry date belongs on the quote, where both sides can see it.
Do I need separate billing software for hybrid pricing?
You need billing software that can rate usage, but it doesn't have to be separate from your CPQ. Running Quoting and Billing from one contract removes the re-keying step between them. If your CPQ has no native billing, you'll need a billing tool plus an integration that carries the commit, credits, overage rate and ramps across without anyone re-typing them.
Is Salesforce CPQ still an option for hybrid pricing?
Salesforce CPQ is end of sale, which means Salesforce no longer sells it to new customers, though existing customers can keep using it. Salesforce points buyers to Revenue Cloud (Agentforce Revenue Management), which supports usage commitments and consumption tiers. Teams that don't want to stay in the Salesforce ecosystem can move to a CRM-agnostic option such as MonetizeNow.
The bottom line on hybrid pricing
Hybrid pricing is a great model until the quote and the invoice stop agreeing. MonetizeNow puts the subscription, the usage, the commit and the credits on one quote and bills them from that same contract, so your team can stop playing telephone with every deal. Here's how MonetizeNow Quoting handles it.
Book a demo →
The short answer: The best CPQ for hybrid usage and recurring pricing quotes the subscription, the usage rates, the minimum commit and the prepaid credits on one quote, then bills all of it without anyone re-typing the deal. MonetizeNow does this for B2B SaaS teams on Salesforce, HubSpot or Attio. Salesforce Revenue Cloud, DealHub, Zuora and Nue are the main alternatives.
Key takeaways
- The best CPQ for hybrid pricing is judged by what happens after the signature, not by how pretty the quote looks.
- A hybrid deal has six terms that must reach billing intact: the subscription, the usage rate card, the minimum commit, prepaid credits, the overage rate and any ramps.
- CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) tools that hand usage terms to a separate billing system turn every hybrid deal into a re-keying job for finance.
- Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Nue and Conga fit teams that live in Salesforce; MonetizeNow, DealHub and Chargebee also work with HubSpot.
- Before you buy, make every vendor demo a minimum commit with overage and a mid-term credit top-up on your own pricing.
Hybrid pricing used to be the exception. Now it's the default for any SaaS company with an API, a data product or an AI feature.
The pricing got smarter. Most quote-to-bill stacks didn't. Sales picked a CPQ. Finance picked a billing tool. Nothing connects the commit on the quote to the invoice at the end of the month.
I spent about three years as an accountant and a decade in the NetSuite world before moving into sales leadership, and I've watched this movie a lot. This post covers what a hybrid deal actually needs from a CPQ, then compares the seven tools worth a look in 2026.
What is hybrid pricing in SaaS?
Hybrid pricing in SaaS is a pricing model that combines a recurring subscription fee with charges based on how much the customer actually uses. A customer might pay a flat annual fee for access, then pay per API call, per transaction or per credit consumed on top of it.
Hybrid pricing gives the seller predictable recurring revenue and still lets revenue grow with customer usage. It gives the buyer a known base cost and a way to pay for more only when they need more. That balance is why so many B2B SaaS companies have moved to it, and why so many CPQ tools struggle with it. A seat-based CPQ was built to multiply a price by a quantity once. Hybrid pricing asks the system to keep track of the deal every month for the life of the contract.
What does a hybrid deal look like on a quote?
A hybrid deal on a quote carries six commercial terms, and every one of them has to reach the billing system exactly as the rep sold it. These are the terms most "best CPQ" lists skip, and they are where hybrid deals go wrong.
- Base subscription: the recurring fee for access, seats or a package, usually billed monthly, quarterly or annually in advance.
- Usage rate card: the price per unit of usage. Rate cards are often tiered (each tier priced separately) or volume-based (the whole quantity priced at the tier the total lands in).
- Minimum commit: a dollar amount the customer agrees to spend on usage in a period. The customer pays the greater of actual usage or the commit, never both.
- Prepaid credits: money the customer pays up front that usage draws down over time. Credits need a balance, a start date and an expiry date.
- Overage: the rate charged once usage passes the included amount or the commit, usually billed in arrears (after the month ends).
- Ramps: planned step-ups in price or quantity during the contract, such as a smaller year one and a bigger year two.
Here's the rule I give every CFO: if the billing system can't read a term straight from the quote, someone types it in. If someone types it in, it will be wrong eventually. The question is just which month.
Why do most CPQ tools break on hybrid pricing?
Most CPQ tools break on hybrid pricing because they stop at the signature. The quote gets signed, a PDF lands in the CRM, and somebody in finance rebuilds the commit, the credits and the overage rate in a separate billing system. That handoff is where hybrid deals leak money.
Think of it as a game of telephone. Sales says "$50,000 annual commit, drawn down monthly, overage at list." Finance hears "$50,000 annual subscription." The invoice says something nobody agreed to, and the customer finds it before you do.
A better model is the restaurant ticket. The kitchen cooks from the same ticket the customer ordered from. Nobody re-writes the order on the way to the stove. A CPQ built for hybrid pricing works the same way: Billing runs from the exact contract the rep quoted.
One RevOps (Revenue Operations) team I worked with this year priced on a matrix: usage tiers on one axis, contract term on the other. Their CRM's quoting tool couldn't hold the matrix, so they created a SKU (stock keeping unit) for every combination and re-typed every closed deal into their billing system by hand. The fix wasn't a better spreadsheet. The fix was one catalog and one contract that both Quoting and Billing read from.
If you want the longer argument for why metering, Quoting and Billing belong together, Sandeep covered it in the problem with standalone metering tools.
What is the best CPQ for hybrid pricing in 2026?
The best CPQ for hybrid pricing in 2026 depends on your CRM and on whether you want Billing from the same vendor. Here are the seven tools worth a look for B2B SaaS teams selling subscription plus usage. Each one is described the same way: who it's best for, how it quotes hybrid deals, how it bills usage, and which CRMs it works with.
1. MonetizeNow
- Best for: B2B SaaS teams selling subscription plus usage who want Quoting, Billing and Revenue Recognition on one contract, whatever CRM they run.
- Hybrid quoting: Subscriptions, one-time fees and usage products sit on the same quote. Usage rates can be tiered, volume, flat, block or custom, with the rep setting the per-unit price on the deal. Minimum commits go on the quote as a dollar amount, billed in advance and drawn down, or in arrears for any shortfall. Prepaid credits are a line on the quote, and ramps are built into the quote as planned schedule changes.
- Usage billing: Native. Usage arrives by API, CSV or manual entry, is rated monthly and billed in arrears from the same contract the rep quoted. Prepaid credits are drawn down automatically by usage and commit charges on each invoice, and a mid-term top-up is a simple amendment. The billing schedule is generated on the quote itself, so nobody writes a dated invoice schedule into the terms.
- CRM fit: CRM-agnostic, with first-class integrations to Salesforce, HubSpot and Attio. Your CRM and your ERP (accounting system) stay in place.
MonetizeNow, a Quote-to-Cash solution for B2B SaaS covering CPQ, Billing and Revenue Recognition, was built around one idea: the quote is the ticket. Every customer also gets a dedicated customer success team, usually with a shared Slack channel. See how MonetizeNow Billing picks up a hybrid deal the moment it's signed.
2. Salesforce Revenue Cloud (Agentforce Revenue Management)
- Best for: Companies fully committed to Salesforce with in-house or partner admin capacity.
- Hybrid quoting: Supports token, monetary and quantity commitments, consumption tiers through rate management, and overage billed above a monetary commit.
- Usage billing: Consumption and invoicing are included in the Advanced edition. Invoice Management is sold as an add-on.
- CRM fit: Salesforce only.
- Watch out for: The consumption features sit in the higher Advanced edition, listed at $200 per user per month billed annually. Teams on the original Salesforce CPQ should know it is end of sale, not end of life, and Salesforce is steering customers toward Revenue Cloud.
3. DealHub
- Best for: Teams that want guided-selling CPQ and Billing from one vendor on Salesforce, HubSpot or Microsoft Dynamics.
- Hybrid quoting: DealHub says it automates metered pricing, volume discounts and tiered billing, and that prepaid drawdown models are handled natively.
- Usage billing: DealHub Billing, built through the acquisitions of Subzee (2023) and Subskribe (2025).
- CRM fit: Salesforce, HubSpot and Microsoft Dynamics.
- Watch out for: The billing side came from two acquisitions in about two and a half years. DealHub's billing page doesn't describe minimum commits with overage, so ask to see one built on your pricing.
4. Zuora CPQ
- Best for: Teams already running Zuora Billing inside a Salesforce org.
- Hybrid quoting: Supports usage-based pricing and mid-term amendments. Zuora's Quote Studio supports unit-based prepaid with drawdown, including rollover and validity periods.
- Usage billing: Native in Zuora Billing. Zuora also acquired the Togai metering and rating engine in 2024.
- CRM fit: Quote Studio runs inside Salesforce. HubSpot connects through Zuora's Integration Hub.
- Watch out for: According to Zuora's documentation, enhanced prepaid with drawdown must be turned on by Zuora Support, needs Quotes package version 10.62 or later, and is unit-based only.
5. Nue
- Best for: Salesforce-native teams that want CPQ and Billing inside Salesforce and will run Revenue Recognition elsewhere.
- Hybrid quoting: Rates usage against credits, commits, tiers and overages. Nue launched Credit and Commit Burndown in March 2026.
- Usage billing: Native billing and collections.
- CRM fit: Salesforce-native. Nue's site doesn't list a HubSpot integration.
- Watch out for: No built-in Revenue Recognition. Nue's own site tells customers to connect their ERP, tax and revenue recognition systems.
6. Chargebee CPQ
- Best for: Billing-led teams already on Chargebee that need quotes for sales-assisted deals.
- Hybrid quoting: Supports usage meters, prepaid credits, commit tiers, base plus overage, and ramps.
- Usage billing: Native in Chargebee Billing, included in its Flow plan and above.
- CRM fit: Salesforce and HubSpot.
- Watch out for: CPQ is a paid add-on with no published price. Chargebee's documentation also says its newer HubSpot integration supports only flat-fee and per-unit pricing models, so check how a hybrid quote flows if you run HubSpot.
7. Conga
- Best for: Large Salesforce organizations with complex catalogs that also want contract management from the same vendor.
- Hybrid quoting: Conga CPQ quotes usage products, and Conga Billing rates tiered usage.
- Usage billing: Through Conga Billing, a separate module. Usage is totaled monthly and rated using a pricing matrix.
- CRM fit: Salesforce, plus a separate version that runs outside Salesforce.
- Watch out for: Conga's documentation says a flat or rated usage amount "can be set by a matrix, and it cannot be set by tier." The billing docs don't describe minimum commits or prepaid credits, so confirm both in a demo.
How do you choose a CPQ for usage and recurring pricing?
Choose a CPQ for usage and recurring pricing by testing it on your hardest real deal, not the vendor's demo deal. Bring a quote with a minimum commit, prepaid credits and an overage rate, then ask each vendor to show it from quote to invoice. These are the questions that separate the tools:
- One quote, no SKU sprawl: Can a rep put the subscription, usage, commit and credits on one quote without creating a new SKU for every combination?
- Quote to bill without re-keying: Does Billing read the signed quote directly, or does someone rebuild the deal in another system?
- Mid-term changes: Can you add credits, change a commit or add a usage product with an amendment, and does the system handle the proration?
- Ramps and renewals: Can year two be priced differently from year one, and does the renewal start from the current contract instead of a blank quote?
- CRM fit, now and later: Does it work with the CRM you have today, and the one you might move to in three years?
- Revenue Recognition: Does revenue recognition run from the same contract, or is it another integration to maintain?
For a broader checklist that goes beyond hybrid pricing, see 7 things to look for in CPQ for SaaS. If you're comparing billing tools on their own, our guide to Maxio alternatives for SaaS billing covers that side, and Sandeep's CPQ and Quote-to-Cash roundup covers the wider market.
Frequently asked questions
Can CPQ handle usage-based pricing on its own?
A CPQ can quote usage-based pricing, but it can't bill it on its own. Usage has to be collected, rated against the rate card and invoiced every month for the life of the contract. A CPQ for usage-based pricing either includes native billing or hands the usage terms to a separate billing system, and that handoff is where most errors start.
What is a minimum commit with drawdown?
A minimum commit with drawdown is a contract term where the customer pays a committed dollar amount up front, then usage charges draw that amount down during the period. If usage stays below the commit, the customer still pays the commit. If usage goes above it, the extra is billed as overage. The customer pays the greater of actual usage or the commit.
How do prepaid credits work in a SaaS contract?
Prepaid credits in a SaaS contract are an amount the customer pays in advance and spends as they use the product. Each invoice draws down the credit balance until it reaches zero, and usage after that is billed normally. Credits usually expire at the end of the contract, so the expiry date belongs on the quote, where both sides can see it.
Do I need separate billing software for hybrid pricing?
You need billing software that can rate usage, but it doesn't have to be separate from your CPQ. Running Quoting and Billing from one contract removes the re-keying step between them. If your CPQ has no native billing, you'll need a billing tool plus an integration that carries the commit, credits, overage rate and ramps across without anyone re-typing them.
Is Salesforce CPQ still an option for hybrid pricing?
Salesforce CPQ is end of sale, which means Salesforce no longer sells it to new customers, though existing customers can keep using it. Salesforce points buyers to Revenue Cloud (Agentforce Revenue Management), which supports usage commitments and consumption tiers. Teams that don't want to stay in the Salesforce ecosystem can move to a CRM-agnostic option such as MonetizeNow.
The bottom line on hybrid pricing
Hybrid pricing is a great model until the quote and the invoice stop agreeing. MonetizeNow puts the subscription, the usage, the commit and the credits on one quote and bills them from that same contract, so your team can stop playing telephone with every deal. Here's how MonetizeNow Quoting handles it.
Book a demo →
.jpg)
.png)
